New Mexico’s rivers, streams and wetlands are some of the most threatened waters in the country. Starting with several U.S. Supreme Court rulings in 2001, 2006, and the most recent ruling in 2023, which reduced the number of waters protected by the federal Clean Water Act, water quality protections for New Mexico’s waters have been under threat.
The constantly changing federal water protections over the past decade has disproportionately impacted New Mexico due to its large percentage of ephemeral/intermittent streams and closed basins (watersheds that do not feed traditional navigable waterways). The Sackett v EPA ruling on May 25, 2023, left New Mexico particularly vulnerable to pollution and other threats to clean water.
Unlike federal rollbacks in other areas of environmental protection, New Mexico’s waters do not have state protections to fall back on. New Mexico is one of just three states that does not have a state surface water permitting program to control the discharge of pollution into rivers, streams, and lakes. There is now no entity with regulatory authority to manage existing discharges from the wastewater treatment plants, mines, federal facilities, and other polluters that currently discharge into these smaller New Mexico streams.
The Sackett ruling increases vulnerability for ephemeral and intermittent streams (96% of New Mexico’s streams according to the New Mexico Environment Department) and wetlands, which together provide critical wildlife habitat, as well as water sources for drinking water, irrigation, and recreation opportunities.
The Sackett ruling magnifies the need for New Mexico to create it’s own surface water permitting program in order to remove the regulatory uncertainty created by unreliable federal protections and secure primacy for regulating discharges to the waters in our state. The people and communities who rely on these waters know best how to protect our state’s waters. Decisions should be made based on the best available data and mapping.
A comprehensive state surface water permitting program will protect both New Mexico’s streams and wetlands, as well as additional resources to protect them in the near-term.
***The $840k special appropriation was not included in the Executive Budget because of the limitations on budget requests and NMED’s leadership recognition of the need to prioritize a pay equity line item that will better enable the agency to fill critical vacancies as well as retain current employees. NMED has indicated that they would welcome these funds. The $840k includes $150k for mapping and $690k for for near-term protections.
Because Water Matters. Dismiss